UK to restrict war crimes prosecution for events abroad after warrants issued for Israelis

By Raphael G. Satter, AP
Thursday, March 4, 2010

UK to restrict prosecution for war crimes abroad

LONDON — British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said Thursday he would move to block private groups from launching war crimes prosecutions against visiting foreign dignitaries, following a controversy inflamed when an arrest warrant was issued for former Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni.

Brown said that Britain’s principle of universal jurisdiction — a wide-ranging legal concept that allows judges to issue warrants for nearly any visitor accused of committing war crimes anywhere in the world — was being abused.

While heads of state and senior ministers enjoy immunity, pro-Palestinian groups have used the law to try to arrest former or retired Israeli officials, including Livni, who now serves as opposition leader, and retired general Doron Almog, who narrowly dodged arrest at Britain’s Heathrow Airport in 2005.

Brown said the law was being exploited by groups “who set out only to grab headlines knowing their case has no realistic chance of a successful prosecution.”

Writing in The Daily Telegraph Thursday, Brown said “Britain cannot afford to have its standing in the world compromised for the sake of tolerating such gestures.”

Israelis were outraged when an arrest warrant was issued for Livni in December before her planned visit to the U.K. The warrant was revoked after she canceled her trip, but Israeli officials said her treatment — and British arrest threats against other officials and military commanders — risked poisoning relations between the two countries.

The Jewish state demanded that Britain change the law, which Israeli politicians describe as absurd.

Brown made no direct reference to Israel in his editorial, but he noted that “there is already growing reason to believe that some people are not prepared to travel to this country for fear that such a private arrest warrant — motivated purely by political gesture — might be sought against them.”

Brown said he would propose a change in the law which would restrict the right to prosecute war crimes covered under the universal jurisdiction laws to Britain’s Crown Prosecution Service — effectively barring private groups from taking foreign VIPs to court. Brown said he would also toughen the standard of evidence required in such cases.

Britain’s Parliament would have to approve the rule change before it became law. Human rights groups and British Muslim organizations have already expressed their opposition to any change.

A similar tightening of the rules has already taken place in Spain, which like Britain also has subscribed to the concept of universal jurisdiction — and which has also attracted Israel’s ire.

Spanish judges have indicted Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet and al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden, among others. The practical effect of the doctrine was negligible because extraditions were rare — but momentum for reform started building last year after a judge started probing a deadly 2002 Israeli air force bombing and alleged Chinese abuses in Tibet.

Both Israel and China complained, and Spanish officials promised that the government would amend the law. In a rare show of bipartisan unity, the rules were changed last year so that they could only be invoked if Spanish victims were involved, or if the alleged perpetrators were in Spain.

There was no immediate comment from Israel’s foreign ministry to Brown’s announcement Thursday.

On the Net:

Brown’s editorial in the Telegraph: bit.ly/bcDH0u

YOUR VIEW POINT
NAME : (REQUIRED)
MAIL : (REQUIRED)
will not be displayed
WEBSITE : (OPTIONAL)
YOUR
COMMENT :